The Honolulu Police Department is considering the idea on the basis of a study done as a result of a request by a member of the Mayor's Downtown/Chinatown Task Force. The focus of the proposal is Chinatown - the area bordered by River, King, Bethel and Beretania streets - an area of high rates of street crime, particularly drug trafficking and prostitution.
The study found that cameras could reduce fear, increase business, improve the image of the area and increase police officer safety by acting as a backup. Similar systems are in place in Baltimore, Virginia Beach, Va., Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. The Washington, D.C., Metro system uses cameras. London, often a target of terrorists, has an extensive system.
Honolulu residents are accustomed to surveillance cameras in banks, some buildings and at automatic teller machines. But exposure to cameras on the street would be a new experience for many, and some would find it an objectionable intrusion on their privacy. Others would accept it as a step toward improved security. Lynne Matusow, chairwoman of the Downtown Neighborhood Board, favors surveillance cameras.
In a less crowded, less dangerous world, the idea of constant exposure to cameras on the street might have prompted widespread protests about Big Brother. Today, many might not like it but our bet is most would accept it as a necessary response to the growth of crime. What, after all, is the difference in terms of privacy between being watched by a camera and being watched by a police officer? And cameras are a lot cheaper.
Whether the state or the federal government should shoulder the cost is another question. In any case, this is one government expense that few people are likely to complain about.

Rupert E. Phillips, CEO
John M. Flanagan, Editor & Publisher
David Shapiro, Managing Editor
Diane Yukihiro Chang, Senior Editor & Editorial Page Editor
Frank Bridgewater & Michael Rovner, Assistant Managing Editors
A.A. Smyser, Contributing Editor